 |
|
2009 Buick Enclave CXL
Compare the Enclave to the Yukon
List Price: $36,440
Invoice: $34,071
|
Buick Enclave Advantages:
 | 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | Navigation System Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
| | Third Row Seating Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 3.6L) |
| | Engine (8 cylinder vs. 6 Cylinder) |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1631) |
| | 32 More Horsepower (320 vs. 288) |
|
| |
|
2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer SS3
Compare the TrailBlazer to the Yukon
List Price: $36,285
Invoice: $33,926
|
Chevrolet TrailBlazer Advantages:
| | Larger Engine (6.0L vs. 5.3L) |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
| | 70 More Horsepower (390 vs. 320) |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1505) |
| | Better Highway Mileage (22 vs. 16) |
| | Better City Mileage (16 vs. 12) |
|
| |
|
2009 Dodge Durango Limited
Compare the Durango to the Yukon
List Price: $37,860
Invoice: $34,442
|
Dodge Durango Advantages:
| | 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | DVD Player Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
| | Third Row Seating Standard |
| | Roof Rack Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | Traction Control Standard |
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 4.7L) |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1516) |
|
| |
|
2009 Ford Expedition EL XLT
Compare the Expedition to the Yukon
List Price: $36,345
Invoice: $33,410
|
Ford Expedition Advantages:
| | Costs $995 Less |
| | 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | Roof Rack Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1697) |
|
| |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Touring 5-Spd AT
Compare the Pilot to the Yukon
List Price: $36,795
|
Honda Pilot Advantages:
| | Costs $545 Less |
| | 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | Navigation System Standard |
| | CD Changer Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
| | Third Row Seating Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 3.5L) |
| | Engine (8 cylinder vs. 6 Cylinder) |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1527) |
| | 70 More Horsepower (320 vs. 250) |
|
| |
|
2009 Jeep Commander Limited
Compare the Commander to the Yukon
List Price: $37,985
Invoice: $34,647
|
Jeep Commander Advantages:
| | 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | Navigation System Standard |
| | DVD Player Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
| | Sunroof/Moonroof Standard |
| | Roof Rack Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Costs $1,145 Less |
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 4.7L) |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1220) |
|
| |
|
2008 Lincoln MKX
Compare the MKX to the Yukon
List Price: $35,420
Invoice: $32,713
|
Lincoln MKX Advantages:
| | Costs $1,500 Less |
| | 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | Navigation System Standard |
| | CD Changer Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 3.5L) |
| | Engine (8 cylinder vs. 6 Cylinder) |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | 55 More Horsepower (320 vs. 265) |
|
| |
|
2009 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Compare the Pathfinder to the Yukon
List Price: $36,310
|
Nissan Pathfinder Advantages:
| | Costs $1,030 Less |
| | 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | CD Changer Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 4.0L) |
| | Engine (8 cylinder vs. 6 Cylinder) |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1335) |
| | 54 More Horsepower (320 vs. 266) |
|
| |
|
2009 Toyota 4Runner Limited V8
Compare the 4Runner to the Yukon
List Price: $37,085
Invoice: $33,115
|
Toyota 4Runner Advantages:
| | 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| | CD Changer Standard |
| | Leather Seats Standard |
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| | Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| | Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 4.7L) |
| | OnStar System Standard |
| | More Payload Capacity (1830 vs. 1210) |
| | 60 More Horsepower (320 vs. 260) |
|
| |
